PDA

View Full Version : Boy, that's gotta hurt!



Huggy85
10-30-2009, 07:43 PM
Friday, Oct 30, 2009 09:50 PDT
Public still blames Bush for recession

President Obama nicely positioned to take credit for recovery

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/10/30/blame_economy

In the long view, how the economy is doing might matter more in shaping public opinion -- and hence, elections -- than everything else put together. Unsurprisingly, conservatives have been nattering for a while about how President Obama ought to shoulder the blame for the economy’s performance on his watch. But Republicans seem to be getting nowhere with that argument, according to a new survey from an unlikely source.

According to a Fox News poll out today, 58 percent of registered voters think President Bush is more responsible for the state of the economy; only 18 percent say President Obama is more responsible. Even Republicans only blame Obama over Bush by a feeble six-point margin, 35 to 29.

Yesterday we found out that the economy was growing again, with GDP up by 3.5 percent in the third quarter after having been on the downswing for months. Clearly, it would have been hard to ride out that decline politically, and reach the beginning of a turnaround, without the public opinion latitude that today’s poll implies. Now the president is nicely positioned to scoop up the credit for a recovery while the public continues to blame his predecessor for the original problem.


Let's repeat that.....

"According to a Fox News poll out today, 58 percent of registered voters think President Bush is more responsible for the state of the economy; only 18 percent say President Obama is more responsible" A FOX NEWS poll....................


Thankfully Obama and the Democrats came along to pick up the pieces and put America back together again.

Soundbear
10-31-2009, 11:33 AM
That's politics!!!

Bluesky
10-31-2009, 11:57 AM
WHat a dumb question.

Of course the previously sitting president (who was there for EIGHT years) is more responsible than the current pres.. who is there for 8 months..

Slow news day.

Soundbear
10-31-2009, 12:49 PM
WHat a dumb question.

Of course the previously sitting president (who was there for EIGHT years) is more responsible than the current pres.. who is there for 8 months..

Slow news day.

Ya figure Slow thinks so??? :) :) :)

Bluesky
10-31-2009, 01:42 PM
I am not going to speak for Slow. Are you fixated on him or what? He's American and a republican. What do you expect? Sheesh.

Like I said, any sitting president would be more responsible than the current president. It's logical, and not even a partisan statement.

But the word 'more' begs the question. How much more? 1%? 10%? 1000%?

Like I said, it's a dumb question.
Get specific. How was he responsible? What decisions or lack of decisiveness led to the economic downturn?

Slow
10-31-2009, 03:07 PM
I am not going to speak for Slow. Are you fixated on him or what?

You have no idea :)

Soundbear
10-31-2009, 04:29 PM
.... Are you fixated.....

Yer getting reall good at figuring out motives.

Hope you're not using those skills professionaly.

Bluesky
10-31-2009, 05:19 PM
It was a question, not a statement. I hope you can tell the difference between a question and a statement in your profession. ;)

Soundbear
10-31-2009, 08:12 PM
So maybe you could recognize that questioning a person's intelligence is not necessarily a gross insult??? :) :) :)