WTF!?!?

[KDawg]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">THE West must be prepared to carry out pre-emptive nuclear strikes to halt the spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, according to a radical manifesto for a new NATO by five of the West's most senior military officers and strategists.

Calling for reform of NATO and a new pact drawing the US, NATO and the European Union together in a "grand strategy" to tackle the challenges of an increasingly brutal world, the former armed forces chiefs from the US, Britain, Germany, France and The Netherlands insist a "first strike" nuclear option remains an "indispensable instrument" since there is "simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world". </div></div>

NATO must fire first shot at nukes

NATO must drop nuclear bombs in order to prevent nuclear bombs from being dropped!?!? NATO IS OFFICIALLY RUN BY CRACKHEADS.

How many people are going to buy into this line of logic? We live in terrible times with people like this making the decisions.

[Hans]

Have they not learned from the WMD hysteria case in Iraq?

[Wrangler35]

Just imagine the reasoning:Bush,Cheney make false accusations in order to Invade (illegally) Iraq..and if we read Shadowjacks piece on reasoning..we quickly understand why..howe-ever the ends does not justify the means...Bush and Blair are just a few that need to be brought to justice.

[Koss]

"The first use of nuclear weapons must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction."

WAR IS PEACE

[Hans]

To prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction, we must first use weapons of mass destruction.

Makes sense, not.