It looks like the Union already has it's hands full..as the company wants to eliminate the letters of agreement signed previously between the company and the union. It's interesting to see what the outcome is .
It looks like the Union already has it's hands full..as the company wants to eliminate the letters of agreement signed previously between the company and the union. It's interesting to see what the outcome is .
u make me laugh..................
ya we will,u still make me laugh..........lol.....you would be a great person to tell a rumor too......we thought fires spread fast.........lol..Get the facts first before you speak,oh but i bet you did.........sorry...LMFAO!!!!!!!!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: steve</div><div class="ubbcode-body">ya we will,u still make me laugh..........lol.....you would be a great person to tell a rumor too......we thought fires spread fast.........lol..Get the facts first before you speak,oh but i bet you did.........sorry...LMFAO!!!!!!!! </div></div>
so your saying the local newspapers are writing rumors ?
I'd just leave ASI and get a job elsewere
yes i am......
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Macs</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It looks like the Union already has it's hands full..as the company wants to eliminate the letters of agreement signed previously between the company and the union. It's interesting to see what the outcome is . </div></div>
The company claims these letters of agreement have hurt the companies performance.That statement was made after a estimated billion dollars in profits since the last contract.
CANADA................"often imitated but never duplicated"
It always the same every contract each side asks for the moon. I'd give the upper hand to the company after all how much fight can a jelly fish put up?
I believe the strike mandate vote is july 2nd so we'll have our answer shortly.
CANADA................"often imitated but never duplicated"
These votes are all the same every time with a strong vote for strike action, I've yet to see one that wasn't . It's all part of the game.
Just a word of advice after going through the last strike, take everything with a grain of salt from BOTH the company and the union as they are both liars and neither truly care about the worker. The company wants your labour for as cheap as possible and the union wants your dues. The last strike I was a firm union member till I caught the area rep in a bald face lie and then the lights went on for me.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: grumpy</div><div class="ubbcode-body">These votes are all the same every time with a strong vote for strike action, I've yet to see one that wasn't . It's all part of the game. </div></div>
Correct. These strike votes are merely a formality. Without a strike vote, the union has no power in negotiations, you'll never see a strike mandate vote that does no give an overwhelming approval for a strike.
Without a pro-strike vote, the company has no motivation to negotiate with the union
Oh... and Grumpy...a jellyfish killed the crocdile hunter!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks