Time to Get Creative

[R W G R]

your latest vendetta against Pope B16 is running out of steam, real fast ...


The current Vatican number two, and not Pope Benedict XVI, bore the main responsibility for inaction in the scandal of a US priest accused of molesting deaf children, a German magazine said Monday.

Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone -- who was the deputy chief of the Church's moral watchdog when it was headed by the current pope -- played the role of a "brake" in the affair, the Die Zeit weekly said.

Benedict has faced criticism over claims that, as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, he failed to take action despite being alerted twice by the archbishop of Wisconsin to claims that Reverend Lawrence Murphy had abused 200 children.

But Die Zeit, citing a copy of Vatican documents, said that at a crisis meeting arranged by the Vatican in 1998, it was Bertone who raised numerous obstacles against internal disciplinary proceedings against the US priest.

http://www.france24.com/en/20100405-...se-case-report

[Bluesky]

All I can say is ... huhhhh???

[R W G R]

All I can say is ... huhhhh???

You and your minions wanted to pin all of this on the Pope. Obviously it was not him involved in the mishandling of the case.

But I am sure you were going to post this soon, and offer an apology to the Pope.

[Bluesky]

You and your minions wanted to pin all of this on the Pope.

I did NOT! You know nothing about my motives. It's your overdeveloped paranoia that drives you to that conclusion.
The fact that he led in the headlines almost very day for weeks had somethng to do with it though.

[R W G R]

I did NOT! You know nothing about my motives. It's your overdeveloped paranoia that drives you to that conclusion.
The fact that he led in the headlines almost very day for weeks had somethng to do with it though.

And why did he lead in the headlines? Maybe because the secular media has it in for him? Or is it just "paranoia" to think the secular media will take shots at Christianity whenever it can?

Your motives were quite clear. You wanted to smear the RCC, and you knew the best place to start is at the top. Yet for three weeks I posted links showing that a majority of the stories in the media were either very shoddy journalism, or outright lies. Even the British reporter that was one of the first to break the American RCC abuse story said this latest attempt to smear Benedict was over-board, and just plain poor journalism and reporting.

And so you backed off.

How noble.

[Bluesky]

OK, Alfie, I'll let you win this time. You're blind with anger. I understand.

[R W G R]

OK, Alfie, I'll let you win this time. You're blind with anger. I understand.

You, consciously, didn't let me do anything.

However, your inability to be even half the person you want others to be has, in fact, done much.

[NewCasa]

You, consciously, didn't let me do anything.

However, your inability to be even half the person you want others to be has, in fact, done much.

Geez you're an insulting person.