Vianet.ca
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Why?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Soo
    Posts
    4,496

    Default Why?

    Why the hell do the PC's figure we need a nuclear power plant in Northern ON when we have a safe, renewable source in abundance....water!!

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sault
    Posts
    32,831

    Default Re: Why?

    Because it cost a whack of money to build a hydro plant, and the best sites are long gone.
    ''Our culture has accepted two huge lies: The first is that if you disagree with someone’s lifestyle, you must fear them or hate them. The second is that to love someone means you agree with everything they believe or do. Both are nonsense. You don’t have to compromise convictions to be compassionate.''

  3. #3
    Senior Member 1337's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,803

    Default Re: Why?

    With superior dropping as much as it does. The cost to run a hydro plant compared to a nuclear plant, it makes most sense for a nuclear plant.

    Nuclear is safe and clean. If handled well. Water too can be just as dangerous, ie. Tsunami.
    ....................

  4. #4
    Guest

    Default Re: Why?

    Plus there are all the problems associated with creating the dammed backwaters such as environmental impact, property rights and the huge release of greenhouse gases as the inundated organic material decomposes under the new "lake".

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    My own little reality
    Posts
    2,921

    Default Re: Why?

    How 'bout they start shutting off some of those millions of lights left on all night in southern Ontario office towers, and then we won't NEED a nuke plant up here.

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sault
    Posts
    32,831

    Default Re: Why?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: The Shadow</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Plus there are all the problems associated with creating the dammed backwaters such as environmental impact, property rights and the huge release of greenhouse gases as the inundated organic material decomposes under the new "lake". </div></div>

    I've often wondered about statements like that.

    Certainly there would be a release of so-called "greenhouse gases", but all that stuff would eventually rot anyway.

    And imagine if you will getting in a plane and taking off from that lake. and flying higher and higher. Unless it was the size of Lake Superior, it's size will quickly become insignificant compared to the extent of even our area of Northern Ontario.
    ''Our culture has accepted two huge lies: The first is that if you disagree with someone’s lifestyle, you must fear them or hate them. The second is that to love someone means you agree with everything they believe or do. Both are nonsense. You don’t have to compromise convictions to be compassionate.''

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts